The CFPB and Biden administration propose limiting bank overdraft fees to $3, seeking to curb excessive charges that disproportionately impact consumers.
The plan suggests banks can charge actual costs or adhere to a predetermined maximum, potentially eliminating the current $35 overdraft fees.
The regulations target major financial institutions with over $10 billion in assets, potentially facing opposition from banks and legal challenges.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Biden administration have collaborated to present a proposed regulation that would curb bank overdraft costs, perhaps bringing them down to $3.
President Biden has highlighted the impact that major banks routinely impose on clients who overdraw their accounts, calling these penalties predatory. The rule aims to reduce these significant costs. The action aims to allay long-standing worries about outrageous overdraft fees, which sometimes surpass $30 and unfairly affect consumers while boosting bank profits.
(Photo : by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Biden administration have collaborated to present a proposed regulation that would curb bank overdraft costs, perhaps bringing them down to $3.
The plan, according to the CFPB, would allow banks to charge customers the actual cost of covering an overdrawn account, or they may adhere to a predetermined maximum. This would essentially do away with the $35 costs that are currently associated with overdrafts. As to the CFPB, banks get around $9 billion in revenue from these fees annually.
According to the agency, the regulations would include banks and credit unions with more than $10 billion in assets, or around 175 of the largest financial institutions in the country. All may keep charging their clients the full amount needed to pay off an overdraft, but they would no longer be able to make significant profits from the service.
Instead of giving the CFPB a detailed analysis of the expenses, banks might decide to implement a benchmark charge; among amounts suggested by regulators include $3, $6, $7, and $14. By April 1, the agency intends to request feedback from the public and business community. The regulation is anticipated to go into effect in October 2025.
Small credit lines, which function similarly to credit cards, might potentially be offered by banks to their clients so they can overdraw their accounts. That kind of service is now provided by certain lenders, such as Truist Bank.
It is expected that banks would oppose the proposed restrictions and be ready to launch a massive lobbying campaign. It is also quite likely that any regulation that is implemented will be challenged in court. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) plan was met with criticism by the American Bankers Association, a well-known trade association for the industry.
The group characterized the idea as an attempt to misrepresent and vilify properly regulated and openly reported bank fees for overdraft services.
The group contended that the regulation may make it more difficult for banks to safeguard overdrafts, especially for clients who have no access to other sources of liquidity. In the end, the association suggested that the CFPB's proposal might deprive customers of a service that they need and appreciate.
Decades ago, banks began allowing certain checking account users to withdraw money below zero in order to prevent paper checks from bouncing.
But with the widespread use of debit cards, which cause users to debit their bank accounts for little and big amounts every day, sometimes many times, what started out as a specialized service developed into a massive profit center for banks.
The banking sector has profited greatly from overdraft fees; according to the CFPB, banks have made $280 billion in overdraft charge revenue in the previous 20 years. The Washington Post claims that these costs gained so traction that a bank CEO called his vessel the "Overdraft."
